The average
size of a family in the 1900s was much larger than the families of today due to
the lack of contraception. Meaning, for poor families, homes could be very
cramped and could have around 10 people in a home with only 2-3 rooms. Children
did not have much time to be children, many saw their children as wage earners,
so when families could no longer sent their children to school and they would
send their children to work at the factories to earn money for their poor
families. Because many did not go to school for a very long time, some believed
they did not build a sense a discipline and often ended up in ganged filled
with drunken violence and rowdy behaviour in the streets. This behaviour was
common in the early 20th century and those young men were commonly
referred to as ‘Larkins’. Many poor families did not have enough money for
food, for thy also had to pay their rent and (commonly) the factories they
worked at did not pay very well. This would be almost the opposite for the rich
families. They did not have to work as hard for little pay, or pay a rent so they
could spend more time together as a family. Children could play in their back
yards and not have to start work from such a young age. Their houses would not
be cramped and often two stories. They would often be more educated because
they did not have to leave school at the age of 12 to work and were less likely
to join a gang. Food was plentiful and many rich families would throw garden
parties or play sport that would be reserved for the rich. But, they would
still have a family of such a large size, just a larger amount of space
compared to the poor. Women of the time would usually work at the factories too
in the poor classes, but not as much in the higher classes. Once a women got
married she had a choice to stay at home or to continue working, but many just
stayed at home and did house work (or their maids did!)Some other work the rich
women would do would be to do works for charities.
fix your grammar
ReplyDelete